Richard M. Christensen
Brief Biography

fclogofailuredescription

Professor Research Emeritus Aeronautics and Astronautics

Senior Scientist Retired Materials Science &

Failure Surface Graphics

Home Page

Failure Characterization

 

The illustration is of the quasi-static failure of cast iron under torsion.  The failure surface is inclined at 45 degrees  to the longitudinal axis.  Thus the failure surface takes the orientation that produces the maximum possible tensile stress component (principal stress) as acting upon it.  A failure criterion must respect and reflect this physical characteristic for this particular material type, but if it is to apply generally it must also be compatible with many other physical failure characteristics for other isotropic materials types.

It is highly advisable that the failure characterization for any one materials type, epoxy polymers for example, follow directly as a specialization from a comprehensive form applicable to all homogeneous and isotropic materials. Success across the spectrum of all materials types, from very ductile to very brittle, would be much more likely to assure success for any one particular class of interest.

In the present work it first will be required that the general characterization admit the one property Mises criterion at one extreme, since it gives the most nearly correct results for ductile metals. Then at the other end of the scale, realistic specializations must occur for the cases of brittle ceramics, glasses and geological materials, which surely would require more than one property.

It is furthermore required that the general theory be calibrated by only a few (preferably two) failure properties. If many properties appeared to be needed, the situation would inevitably degenerate to being just that of adjusting or fitting parameters rather than that of an evaluation from mechanical properties. The same unsatisfactory situation would usually occur in merely fitting data for a single materials type with no regard for anything else.

It is left as an exercise to show that the two property, general theory expounded in Section II predicts physical results for cast iron that are completely consistent with those described in the first paragraph above. On a scale going from limit case ductility to extreme brittleness, this example of cast iron corresponds to a moderately brittle case and thus is intermediate on that scale. Other examples from other major classes of materials are equally important to examine.

The mainstream topics of traditional interest have mostly been composed of isotropic materials. However, anisotropic materials in general and fiber composite materials in particular are of great contemporary interest and relevance. These broader classes of materials will also be included. Beyond the idealization of quasi-static failure lie the even more difficult classes of fatigue and rate dependent failure. These too should be and will be covered. Nevertheless, the priority order taken here is that a consistent and self contained formulation of quasi-static, isotropic material failure must come first. If this most basic aspect of failure cannot be correctly treated, then there is little likelihood for succeeding with the even more difficult problems.

Despite the historically slow and sometimes convoluted path of progress, modern developments for failure criteria have confronted the basic problems and yielded tractable and cohesive results. The main body of these failure criteria for homogeneous materials along with the complementary field of fracture mechanics go far toward providing a general framework for materials failure characterization.





 

item9

Recent Additons
Updated Jun. 9, 2017

Failure Characterization

Key Junctures

stfailurecriterian

Navigating the Website
Understanding the Discipline

The First Failure Criterion

General Matters

FrontPageMisesTrescaGraph1

New Book on Failure

How Do Mises & Tresca Fit In

item11
kinkband1

Is It Stress or Strain

A Basic Failure Mechanism

item13
bendingiron1

Can Atomic/Nano Scale
Failure Events Predict
Macroscopic Failure

The Ductile-Brittle Problem

damage1
item12

Damage

Failure Theory Applications

shardpotterysmall1
item18

The Brittle Limit

Unsolved Problems

WhichisFundamentalsquare1
item21

Which is Fundamental:
T&C or S&D

Physical Ductility of Elements

WWFEsmall
WWFEmap

Letter to WWFE

WWFE-II Results

TimMedal
bugler1

A Call to Service

Timoshenko Medal

thm

Acknowledgment

Copyright© 2017
Richard M. Christensen

Looking Ahead

SmallFrontPage
Compass
item23
item1
item1a